CFO’s Complete Guide to Invisible Signature Brand Protection Solution

Executive Summary

Invisible authentication embeds cryptographic security directly into existing packaging artwork, eliminating the need for costly redesigns, plate making, regulatory re-filing, and consumables for your brand protection solution. By removing specialized hardware and zero-disruption deployment, finance teams unlock eight distinct value drivers:

·      Artwork Cost Avoidance: No creative or prepress cycles. 

·      Factory Downtime Elimination: Preserve throughput by avoiding stop-and-validate windows. 

·      Packaging Real-Estate Value: Reclaim 5–9 in² of premium space for brand messaging. 

·      Hardware Elimination: Replace scanners with smartphone verification. 

·      Speed-to-Market Advantage: Launch in 2–4 weeks instead of 6–12 months. 

·      Consumer Engagement Revenue: Turn verification into a loyalty and data channel.

·      Supply-Chain Intelligence: Detect diversion and forecast more accurately.

·      Sustainability Goals: Avoid added plastic, inks, and adhesives equivalent to 50 tons annually.

Two success stories illustrate rapid payback: 

·      A global FMCG brand detected multimillion-dollar distributor diversion via “missing scans” 

·      A major spare-parts manufacturer authenticated hundreds of thousands of SKUs across 30+ facilities, consolidated vendors, and standardized dealer verification—all within weeks.

This guide provides:

·      A CFO-ready ROI model with driver-by-driver breakdown. 

·      Detailed case-proven benchmarks and formulas. 

·      A zero-disruption, four-week deployment playbook.

Calculate Your Invisible Authentication ROI in 5 Minutes →

Read the FMCG Case Study →

Read the Enterprise Case Study →

What Invisible Authentication Means

Invisible authentication embeds a cryptographic signature directly into existing packaging artwork, making verification possible without altering the label design or stopping production. Any stakeholder—consumer, inspector, distributor, or dealer—can use a standard smartphone to scan and instantly confirm authenticity. This approach differs fundamentally from traditional anti-counterfeit methods:

·      Holograms & Visible Labels

Require new artwork, specialized printing plates, and ongoing consumables. They are visible targets for counterfeiters and consume high-value packaging space.

·      QR/DataMatrix & Serialization

Demand reconfiguration of print presses, incorporation of quiet zones, scanner infrastructure, and regulatory re-approvals. They provide traceability but not definitive proof of authenticity at the moment of use.

·      RFID/NFC Tags

Involve tag inlays, encoders, fixed or handheld readers, and middleware integration. They carry CapEx and interoperability challenges and may suffer read reliability issues in metal or liquid packaging.

The CFO View of ROI

Finance leaders can model invisible authentication as a combination of cost avoidance and value creation levers, replacing “security spend” with “profit-driving authentication platform.”

1.        Cost Avoidance

a.        No artwork redesign or prepress cycles 

b.        Zero line-down time for scanner or label integration 

c.        Elimination of scanner and reader CapEx and maintenance

2.        Value Creation

a.        Faster launches: Deploy in 2–4 weeks instead of 6–12 months, accelerating revenue recognition. 

b.        Reclaimed packaging space: Reuse 5–9 in² for marketing claims or promotional messaging. 

c.        Consumer engagement: Verification flows become a data and loyalty channel, generating first-party insights and incremental revenue. 

d.        Supply-chain intelligence: Real-time verification density data expose diversion, improve forecasting, and reduce recalls.

Core Attributes That Unlock Returns

·      Zero Artwork Change

No creative or prepress fees, no regulatory re-filing or plate-making costs.

·      Zero Process Change

No stop-and-validate windows, no requalification cycles, no operator retraining.

·      Smartphone Verification

Leverages devices already in the field—no scanners, no proprietary readers, minimal training.

·      Rapid Deployment

A standard 4-week activation playbook, enabling parallel validation with existing production.

·      Continuous Intelligence

Verification events flow into analytics dashboards, triggering anomaly alerts and consumer engagement workflows.

Use the ROI Calculator →

Explore Brand Protection Solutions →

Dive into Brand Protection Technology →

Why Legacy Methods Lag

Traditional visible or scanner-based authentication approaches carry significant operational disadvantages and hidden costs that impact both the P&L and operational KPIs, ultimately limiting their effectiveness and value realization.

Operational Friction and Hidden Costs

·      Artwork and Packaging Changes

Visible security features such as holograms, labels, or printed codes require re-cutting artwork, reprinting plates, and obtaining re-approval from regulatory bodies. Every packaging redesign impacts multiple SKUs, plants, and markets, compounding time and cost.

·      Line Integration Disruptions

Adding new marks or installing scanners usually forces production stoppages for mechanical changeover, setup, calibration, and validation cycles. This process requires significant operator training, ongoing maintenance windows, and introduces risk of line speed degradation.

·      Scanner Ecosystem Complexity

Deploying and managing a network of scanners, associated licenses, software updates, repairs, and break/fix logistics across multiple internal and partner facilities creates ongoing operational drag and capital expense.

·      Compliance and Documentation Overhead

Each new visible mark introduces complexity for documentation, audit trails, and expanded compliance surface by increasing the frequency and depth of regulatory interactions, especially for pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic products.

·      Limited Analytics and Intelligence

While some legacy systems provide traceability, they often lack unit-level authenticity verification, consumer engagement data, and real-time diversion intelligence, resulting in slow detection and limited commercial utility.

Underlying Business Risks

·      Copyability and Counterfeiter Adaptation

Visible features provide a tangible target that counterfeiters can replicate or remove. Over time, attackers improve quality, necessitating costly upgrades and continuous innovation by defenders.

·      False Security and Consumer Uncertainty

Visible marks may signal product safety, but counterfeiters exploit gaps in consumer awareness and channel confusion. Detection often happens too late, after significant consumer exposure to fake products.

·      Low Verification Adoption

Hardware-dependent or app-only verification methods deter users in the field due to complexity or unfamiliarity, resulting in thin data, slower response to threats, and diminished ROI.

·      Time-to-Value Delays

Lengthy deployment cycles delay the business benefits, pushing payback beyond initial budget cycles and increasing sunk costs, creating barriers to scaling and innovation.

The Security Treadmill

The combination of rising costs, persistent friction, shallow insight, and incremental enhancements yields the classic security treadmill: a cycle of rising expenditures without proportional risk reduction or business gain.

Invisible authentication shifts this curve by removing friction points while creating new operational and commercial value.

Comparison: Invisible vs Holograms/QR/Serialization →

ROI Calculator →

Eight Financial Value Drivers

Invisible authentication delivers measurable ROI through seven core financial drivers, each quantifiable with your organization’s data. Typical illustrative numbers are provided where appropriate.

1. Artwork Cost Avoidance

Avoid redesign fees, plates, re-filings, and variable print consumables.

·      Design fees: $50,000 per SKU (varies)

·      Plates: $12,000 per SKU (varies)

·      Regulatory re-filing: $25,000 per region

·      Ink consumables, e.g., QR-style black ink per code ≈ 0.001 ml × $0.15/ml = $0.00015 per unit

·      Setup waste (5%), requalification costs: $100,000 per site
 Formula:

Artwork Savings=(SKUs×(Design+Plates+Regulatory))+(Units×0.00015)+Setup waste+Requalification Overhead\text{Artwork Savings} = (\text{SKUs} \times (\text{Design} + \text{Plates} + \text{Regulatory})) + (\text{Units} \times 0.00015) + \text{Setup waste} + \text{Requalification Overhead}Artwork Savings=(SKUs×(Design+Plates+Regulatory))+(Units×0.00015)+Setup waste+Requalification Overhead 

2. Factory Downtime Elimination

Avoid average 30 minutes downtime per line per change event.

·      Example: 20 plants × 0.5 hours × $8,000/hr = $80,000 saved per rollout

·      Multiply by number of rollouts per year for total savings.

3. Packaging Real Estate Value

Reclaim 5–7 square inches per pack valued at $800 per sq. inch annually.

·      For 500,000 units:

5 sq. in×800×500,000=$2,000,0005 \, \text{sq. in} \times 800 \times 500,000 = \$2,000,0005sq. in×800×500,000=$2,000,000 

4. Hardware Elimination

Eliminate scanners/readers and licenses:

·      1,000 endpoints × $1,500 = $1,500,000 saved in CapEx

·      Annual maintenance (15%) and training add to recurring savings.

5. Speed-to-Market Advantage

Accelerate launches by 6–8 weeks, enabling earlier revenue recognition.

·      Weekly gross margin: $250,000

·      Incremental revenue: 6 × 250K = $1.5M

·      Use discounted cash flow for NPV calculation.

6. Consumer Engagement Revenue

Engagement rates: 30% average scan among shipped units
 Value per engaged consumer: $3

·      For 300,000 scanned units:

300,000×3=$900,000300,000 \times 3 = \$900,000300,000×3=$900,000 

7. Supply Chain Intelligence

Forecast accuracy improvement drives 10% working capital reduction.
 Diversion recovery: 15% of estimated leakage on protected SKUs.
 Recall/legal savings vary but can reach low six figures annually.

8. Sustainability & Regulatory Compliance

·      Avoid added plastic, inks, adhesives equivalent to 50 tons annually.

·      Reduce CO₂ emissions by approx. 300 tons/year, valued at $20/ton carbon cost = $6,000 annual savings.

·      Avoid Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) fees of €0.02/unit for 1M units = €20,000.

·      Enhance ESG scores, improving access to regulated markets and investor favor.

Use the ROI Calculator →
 See Compliance & Sustainability Insights →
 Invisible Brand Protection Technology→

Here is the complete and enhanced "How to Calculate ROI" section with the critical inclusion of the sustainability value driver, integrating all operational, financial, and ESG components into a unified model:

How to Calculate ROI

Invisible authentication ROI is the sum of cost avoidance, value creation, and sustainability benefits. Use this transparent, driver-based framework to customize assumptions based on your portfolio, enabling finance teams to validate projections accurately.

Inputs Required

·      Portfolio scope: SKUs covered, annual units shipped, regions, plants, verification endpoints

·      Baseline spend: Artwork redesign cost, plates, regulatory refiling fees, consumables (ink/labels), scanner hardware cost, downtime hourly value, training expenses

·      Revenue and efficiency: Engagement rates, value per engaged consumer, weeks accelerated for launches, forecast accuracy uplift, diversion recovery potential

·      Sustainability: Waste avoided (plastic, inks, adhesives), carbon emissions reduction, EPR fee avoidance, ESG value addition

·      Financial parameters: Discount rate (WACC), time horizon (3–5 years)

Driver Formulas

·      Artwork Avoidance (AA):

AA=(SKUs×(Design+Plates+Regulatory))+(Units×Consumables_unit)AA = (SKUs \times (Design + Plates + Regulatory)) + (Units \times Consumables\_unit)AA=(SKUs×(Design+Plates+Regulatory))+(Units×Consumables_unit) 

·      Factory Downtime Avoidance (FDA):

FDA=Plants×Events_per_year×Hours_avoided_per_event×Line_hourly_valueFDA = Plants \times Events\_per\_year \times Hours\_avoided\_per\_event \times Line\_hourly\_valueFDA=Plants×Events_per_year×Hours_avoided_per_event×Line_hourly_value 

·      Packaging Real Estate Value (PREV):

PREV=SKUs×Freed_sq_inches×Media_value_per_sq_inchPREV = SKUs \times Freed\_sq\_inches \times Media\_value\_per\_sq\_inchPREV=SKUs×Freed_sq_inches×Media_value_per_sq_inch

·      Hardware Elimination (HE):

HE=Verification_points×(Device_cost+Device_cost×Maintenance_rate+Training_cost)HE = Verification\_points \times (Device\_cost + Device\_cost \times Maintenance\_rate + Training\_cost)HE=Verification_points×(Device_cost+Device_cost×Maintenance_rate+Training_cost)

·      Speed-to-Market Value (SMV):

SMV=Weeks_accelerated×Weekly_gross_marginSMV = Weeks\_accelerated \times Weekly\_gross\_marginSMV=Weeks_accelerated×Weekly_gross_margin 

·      Consumer Engagement Revenue (CER):

CER=Units×Verification_rate×Value_per_engaged_consumerCER = Units \times Verification\_rate \times Value\_per\_engaged\_consumerCER=Units×Verification_rate×Value_per_engaged_consumer

·      Supply Chain Intelligence (SCI):

SCI=Diversion_value+Forecast_accuracy_cash_benefit+Recall_avoidance_valueSCI = Diversion\_value + Forecast\_accuracy\_cash\_benefit + Recall\_avoidance\_valueSCI=Diversion_value+Forecast_accuracy_cash_benefit+Recall_avoidance_value

·      Sustainability & Regulatory Compliance Value (SRCV):

SRCV=(Waste_avoided×Waste_cost)+(Carbon_saved×Carbon_price)+EPR_avoided+ESG_brand_valueSRCV = (Waste\_avoided \times Waste\_cost) + (Carbon\_saved \times Carbon\_price) + EPR\_avoided + ESG\_brand\_valueSRCV=(Waste_avoided×Waste_cost)+(Carbon_saved×Carbon_price)+EPR_avoided+ESG_brand_value

Aggregated Formula

·      Total Value (Year 1):

Total_Value=AA+FDA+PREV+HE+SMV+CER+SCI+SRCVTotal\_Value = AA + FDA + PREV + HE + SMV + CER + SCI + SRCVTotal_Value=AA+FDA+PREV+HE+SMV+CER+SCI+SRCV 

·      Investment Cost (Year 1):

Investment=Setup_fees+(Units×P)+SInvestment = Setup\_fees + (Units \times P) + SInvestment=Setup_fees+(Units×P)+S 

·      Return on Investment (ROI):

ROI%=Total_Value−InvestmentInvestment×100ROI\% = \frac{Total\_Value - Investment}{Investment} \times 100ROI%=InvestmentTotal_Value−Investment×100

·      Payback Period (Months):

Payback=InvestmentTotal_Value−Investment12Payback = \frac{Investment}{\frac{Total\_Value - Investment}{12}}Payback=12Total_Value−InvestmentInvestment

·      Net Present Value (NPV):
 Compute discounted net cash flows over 3–5 years at discount rate ddd.

·      Internal Rate of Return (IRR):
 Calculate IRR based on annual net cash flows.

Scenario Testing

Model conservative, realistic, and optimistic scenarios by varying verification adoption, weeks accelerated, and diversion capture in each formula.

Validation Checklist

·      Ensure artwork and regulatory teams confirm zero change to packaging.

·      Confirm ops have verified no impact on line throughput or stability.

·      Work with IT to validate scanner and endpoint counts for hardware savings.

·      Marketing to validate engagement metrics and consumer value per engagement.

·      Finance to confirm discount rates and corporate hurdle targets.

Try Our ROI Calculator →
 Explore Sustainability & Compliance Insights →

Success Story: FMCG “Missing Scans”

This case study demonstrates how invisible authentication transformed brand protection and engagement for a global FMCG portfolio plagued by diversion and counterfeit risks.

Overview

·      Portfolio: High velocity FMCG SKUs spanning three continents 

·      Challenge: Distributor diversion and counterfeit infiltration causing revenue leakage and consumer trust erosion 

·      Objective: Detect diversion in near real-time and enable a direct consumer verification channel without disrupting existing manufacturing or packaging workflows

Deployment Approach

·      Embedded cryptographic invisible authentication within existing artwork with zero change to package design 

·      Enabled smartphone verification across distributor, dealer, and consumer touchpoints 

·      Built cloud-based dashboards comparing verification densities against shipment baselines to identify “missing scans”

Key Outcomes

·      Diversion Detection: Low verification density flags in key regions revealed leakage hotspots

·      Operational Impact: Zero factory downtime; eliminated scanner deployment and maintenance 

·      Consumer Engagement: Verification in markets incentivized with rewards and content, creating a new brand touchpoint 

·      Financial Impact: Recovered margin lost to diversion estimated conservatively using verified-units-to-shipment discrepancy times SKU margin

Financial Framing

·      Diversion recovery: Margin per unit × estimated diverted units derived from scan gaps 

·      Downtime avoidance: Hours × line hourly values × avoided events 

·      Engagement revenue: Verified consumer count × value per engaged consumer 

·      Zero capital expenditure: Eliminated scanners, readers, and related upkeep costs improve cash flow

Executive Quote

“Deploying Ennoventure’s invisible authentication allowed us to catch leakage months earlier, saving millions and strengthening consumer trust without slowing production.”

Deployment Scale

·      SKU count: 15

·      Initial pilot region shipments: 1.2 million units (6-month period)

·      Rollout regions: 3 Southeast Asia markets

·      Verification endpoints: 350 distributor and dealer touchpoints

Key Financial Impacts (First 12 Months)

Total Quantified ROI (12 Months): Approximately $6.8 million

Additional Qualitative Benefits

·      Accelerated consumer trust and brand equity restoration

·      Zero line downtime preserved manufacturing throughput

·      Rapid scalability enabled within 3 months post-pilot

·      Regulatory compliance with evolving ESG standards maintained without incremental cost

See the ROI Calculator →

Explore FMCG Case Studies →

Engage Consumers with Authentication →

This case illustrates the power of blending invisible auth technology with real-time analytics to convert lost revenue into new growth levers.

Success Story: Enterprise Spare-Parts

Customer Profile:

·      Hundreds of thousands of SKUs globally

·      30+ manufacturing, distribution, and repair sites

·      Complex multi-level dealer and field service networks

Challenge:

·      Prevent counterfeit warranty claims

·      Securing brand equity in diversified regions

·      Operational consistency across multiple facilities

Deployment:

·      Invisible cryptographic authentication embedded invisibly within existing artwork

·      Smartphone-based verification for dealer and field teams

·      Real-time analytics dashboards for diversion detection and warranty claim validation

·      Vendor consolidation achieved, reducing complexity

Results:

·      Zero factory downtime and no production disruptions

·      Multi-million dollar hardware savings from eliminated scanners

·      40% reduction in warranty claim audits and manual verification efforts

·      Early diversion detection prevented significant revenue losses

·      High user adoption across internal teams and dealers, minimal training needed

Approximately $16.9 million in quantified annual ROI, excluding intangible benefits such as brand equity uplift.

Customer Feedback:

“Invisible authentication revolutionized our approach to brand protection and warranty validation globally, enhancing both security and operational efficiency.”

Industry Benchmarking 

This section delivers data-driven insights on brand protection spending across core industry sectors (FMCG, Pharma, Automotive, Apparel) and compares the cost, adoption rate, and operational impact of leading authentication technologies: holograms, QR/DataMatrix, RFID/NFC, and invisible authentication. 

Key Insight:

Invisible authentication emerges as the only technology to offer sub-penny cost, rapid deployment, and zero operational downtime unlocking board-level cost efficiency and compliance potential.

Industry Spend Benchmark Table

Comparative Technology Table

Adoption Comparison:

·      Holograms: Highest legacy adoption, but vulnerable to visual copying and added costs.

·      QR/DataMatrix: Excellent for traceability, moderate security, but requires label changes and device infrastructure.

·      RFID/NFC: Most secure legacy, but expensive, slow deployment, and hardware-intensive.

·      Invisible Authentication: Lowest per-unit cost, instant rollout (weeks not months), non-copyable, and no new hardware or process changes.

Key Insights for CFOs:

·      Invisible authentication can reduce overall brand protection spend by 40–70% compared to RFID/hologram systems.

·      Operational downtime and cost spikes from traditional technologies are avoided.

·      Regulatory and ESG compliance become native features, not bolt-ons.

Five-Year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)

·      Holograms and Security Labels incur high plate-making, ink waste, and redesign fees.

·      QR codes need printed consumables, scanner infrastructure, and licenses.

·      RFID has high upfront hardware and middleware costs with complexity.

·      Invisible authentication eliminates line downtime, hardware installation, and uses existing artwork pixels, minimizing costs.

Operational Risk & Adoption Summary

Decision Weighting Scorecard

Pricing Variables

·      P (per-unit fee): Varies by SKU complexity and volume

·      S (subscription): Annual platform and analytics access fee

·      Pricing offsets label and hardware savings to create net positive business value.

Explore Comparison Hub | Get a Executive Demo of our Platform

Deployment Methodology

Deploying invisible authentication solutions efficiently requires a structured 4-week plan that minimizes disruption while ensuring rapid adoption and comprehensive analytics integration.

Week 0–1: Planning and Setup

·      Align SKU lists, target regions, and verification endpoints

·      Provision platform accounts, configure roles and permissions

·      Develop dashboards tailored to supply chain and marketing use cases

·      Prepare training materials and field user guides

Week 2: Signature Application and Validation

·      Apply invisible signatures in prepress workflows in parallel with existing runs

·      Test smartphone verification UX extensively with internal and field users

·      Initiate quality assurance checks for scanning thresholds and false positives

·      Fine-tune platform models and anomaly detection parameters

Week 3: Verification Activation & Channel Onboarding

·      Activate verification workflows for plant QA, logistics, and dealer networks

·      Train field teams and partner organizations on verification apps and procedures

·      Launch consumer verification channels, integrating incentives or engagement flows

·      Implement anomaly dashboards and real-time alert mechanisms

Week 4+: Optimization and Scale-Up

·      Refine scan threshold settings based on early field data

·      Expand SKU coverage and additional site activations

·      Embed analytics into existing business intelligence frameworks

·      Launch marketing engagement campaigns triggered by verification events

Governance & Roles (RACI)

·      Finance: Validate ROI assumptions and approve budgets

·      Operations: Facilitate plant coordination and training

·      IT: Provide endpoint verification integrations and data access controls

·      Quality & Legal: Review compliance and regulatory impacts

·      Marketing: Design consumer engagement flows and incentives

Data and Integration

·      Optional ERP, MES, and WMS connections for shipment and inventory data

·      Role-based dashboard permissions and audit trails

·      Support for API integration and multi-tenant architectures

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

·      Verification coverage and scan density by SKU/site

·      Anomaly detection rate and resolution time

·      Diversion identification and recovery value

·      Consumer engagement rates and revenue impact

This deployment methodology balances speed, risk mitigation, and user adoption to deliver a rapid ROI and prepare your organization for scalable brand protection transformation.

Regulatory Landscape

Regulations shaping authentication and packaging compliance worldwide, including EU EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility), Digital Product Passport, and Scope 3 emissions requirements are scoped out here. This section will provide you and your compliance teams to meet and anticipate evolving mandates rapidly, with built-in sustainability and governance reporting.

Key Insight:

Invisible authentication natively meets and often exceeds the strictest new regulations—ESG, circular economy, digital traceability, and carbon reporting—with zero incremental process or waste.

Key Regulation Table

Compliance Alignment:

·      Invisible authentication creates non-removable, cryptographic proofs inside packaging artwork leading to proactive compliance for Digital Product Passport (EU).

·      No added materials or consumables, automatic EPR and Scope 3 compliance, improved ESG rating and investor scorecards.

·      Enables unit-level traceability for US FDA, pharma, and emerging Asia regulations without line or process disruption.

Sustainability Impact Deep Dive

This section provides a lifecycle analysis of plastic, ink, and packaging waste avoided through invisible authentication, quantifies carbon savings, and documents the contribution to the circular economy. 

Key Insight:
Invisible authentication enables measurable ESG outcomes: zero additional labels, inks, or plastics, quantifiable carbon reductions, and native support for circular economy reporting.

 Lifecycle Impact Table

Sustainability Benefits

·      Eliminates new labels, adhesives, or RFID tags, direct reduction in landfill and ocean waste.

·      No additional ink/chemicals supports circular packaging and green sourcing standards.

·      Reduces Scope 3 carbon by hundreds of tons/year enabling simple, auditable ESG filings.

·      Native compliance for EPR, DPP, and all major global sustainability mandates.

·      Unlocks investor preference and rating agency points with verified sustainability metrics.

FAQ and Common Objections Playbook

This section equips CFOs, legal, and operations teams with concise, evidence-driven responses to the most frequent concerns about invisible authentication: technology risk, compliance, cost, and operational impact. 

CFO Alert:
Invisible authentication is engineered for zero disruption, rapid ROI, and seamless regulatory alignment removing legacy operational risks and future-proofing compliance.

Key Insights:

·      Zero hardware, recurring consumables, and operational downtime.

·      Regulation-ready for EU EPR, DPP, Scope 3 reporting.

·      Cryptographic security blocks all known counterfeiting methods.

·      Full audit trail for legal/ops oversight.

Investment Model

Understanding the cost structure for invisible authentication helps CFOs align budgeting and procurement strategies effectively.

Cost Components

·      Setup Fees: Initial platform configuration, training, and prepress integration

·      Per-Unit Cost (P): Variable fee applied per authenticated unit, typically tiered by SKU complexity and volume

·      Subscription Fee (S): Annual fixed fee covering platform access, analytics, dashboards, support

Financial Model Overview

·      Initial year has setup cost plus P and S

·      Subsequent years exclude setup but include per-unit and subscription fees

Budgeting & Procurement Considerations

·      Compare TCO over 5 years, factoring hardware and consumable cost avoidance

·      Include costs in CapEx (setup) and OpEx (subscription, per-unit fees) for accurate forecasting

·      Leverage procurement to negotiate volume discounts or multi-year agreements

Metrics for CFO Review

·      Payback period calculated from initial investment against annual net benefits

·      Net Present Value (NPV) accounting for discount rate and cashflow projections

·      Internal Rate of Return (IRR) for evaluating investment efficiency

·      Sensitivity analysis on volume growth, per-unit price, and adoption rate

Request Personalized ROI Analysis →

Governance

Our governance frameworks enables CFOs and finance teams to manage invisible authentication investments confidently while tracking operational and commercial KPIs effectively.

Governance Model (RACI)

Key Performance Indicators

·      Verification coverage ratio and defect rate per SKU/site

·      Number and resolution time of diversion or anomaly alerts

·      Scan rate and revenue contribution

·      Reduction in counterfeit incidents confirmed

·      Operational uptime impact and cost savings realized

·      ESG value capture and carbon footprint reduction estimates

Next Steps 

To maximize ROI and operational impact, follow a phased approach to piloting, scaling, and integrating invisible authentication into your enterprise portfolio.

Pilot Blueprint

·      Select 1–3 high-risk SKUs and 2–3 geographic regions for initial pilot

·      Define clear criteria: verification coverage, disruption risk, expected ROI drivers, and anomaly volume

·      Target two to three channels – manufacturing, distribution, and end-consumer–facing as applicable

Scale Plan

·      Phase 1: High-risk SKUs and markets with aggressive deployment and verification incentives

·      Phase 2: Core portfolio SKUs consolidating learnings and expanding site coverage

·      Phase 3: Enterprise-wide rollout with integration into ERP, MES, CRM, and marketing automation

Get Personalized ROI →
 Schedule Cost Assessment →